Montague Institute l Contents l Index l Digest l Courses l Calendar l Subscribe |
|
Why so much coverage of SharePoint? November, 2008
Since 2004, we’ve published 15 articles on SharePoint – 9 of them in 2008 alone. What is it about this popular Microsoft technology that warrants so much coverage in a niche publication like the Montague Institute Review? Since we are not a Microsoft reseller, developer, or consulting firm, we have no reason to "push" the software. We don’t consider SharePoint to be a "best-of-breed" product in search or other information management application. But like other topics we’ve covered over the years – the Internet, knowledge management, taxonomy -- SharePoint has three characteristics that fit our publishing profile. It is:
The de facto standard for collaboration The speed and breadth of its adoption reminds me of the Internet in the 1990’s – another "de facto standard" that swept the business world in a grassroots, bottom-up fashion. What the Internet did for email and networking, SharePoint is doing for content management, collaboration, and desktop productivity. None of its features are "best in class," but they are good enough and can be easily enhanced by end-user developers and programmers. Built-in compatibility with an organization’s existing computing infrastructure (e.g. email, security, word processing) means faster deployment and lower integration costs. The implication of a de facto standard is that it spreads in spite of the conventional wisdom. Its rapid, grassroots uptake usually means that something is happening that most people don’t understand. Our role is to ask early on why and what does it mean? See other Montague Institute Review articles on SharePoint and standards. Boundary-spanning software But there’s a catch. Reaping the benefits of boundary-spanning technology is not easy, especially in large organizations. Not only does it change the way individuals work at the desktop, but it forces managers to re-think how their business processes interface with those in other departments. Which software features should be managed at the enterprise level (e.g. search, taxonomy, security) and who should be responsible for them? Which features should be managed by departments or cross-functional teams? How far do you go in letting individual users customize their own work environment? How do you promote information sharing? See other Montague Institute Review articles on boundary-spanners. An end user development tool End-user development tools like SharePoint can mean lower IT project failure rates and rework costs, less programmer time spent on customization and maintenance, and higher user satisfaction. On the other hand, they can create security lapses, foster content chaos, increase customer support costs, and make it more difficult to upgrade software systems. As the end-user development trend has gathered steam, we’re learning how to capitalize on the upside and minimize the downside. The secret is a hybrid approach in which responsibilities are divided among:
Because SharePoint is relatively easy and inexpensive to install, organizations (especially those where IT takes the lead in implementation) may be tempted to give short shrift to planning, training, and feedback. This is a mistake. The many questions that need to be considered beforehand are best handled by a cross-functional team that includes technical staff, functional and subject matter specialists, metadata architects, content managers, and researchers. The best person to lead such a group is someone who has:
Most important, the leadership role needs to be permanent, because SharePoint implementation (like all end-user development) is an ongoing, iterative process. Inevitably, end-user development changes the relationship between enterprise information specialists (trainers, editors, librarians, taxonomists, search engine administrators, IT analysts etc). They find themselves doing more coordinating, training, strategizing, and marketing than heads-down performing in their specialty. Fortunately, learning to use SharePoint features like search scopes, managed properties, templates, and Best Bets helps end-user developers at the department and division level understand the value of participating in enterprise-wide metadata and content standards. But knowledgeable info pros must be available to demonstrate, guide, and advise when the time is ripe. See other Montague Institute Review articles on end user development. Doing what we do best
|